ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

Why Fantasy Football is Better Than Fantasy Basketball

Last week, I talked about how fantasy basketball is better than fantasy football, but the fact of the matter is that fantasy basketball can be just as frustrating as fantasy football, and in many ways, football is the superior product. In fact, many of the reasons I listed last week for why I like basketball more can actually be used as a reason for why football is better. Really.

Head-to-head once a week is awesome. I'm in some head-to-head basketball leagues and the whole category thing is just kind of dull. Hey, I won 5-to-3-to-1 this week! In football, you have one team to beat in points and you can spend all day Sunday watching your match-up. In basketball, you "lose" in turnovers even when you pull ahead in other categories. And with all those games (including late games), most of which aren't on t.v., it's less fun to "watch" your games. You just don't have the time.

The big play can turn your week around. When Kobe Bryant makes a steal and runs down the court for a thundering dunk, you can smile and say "I got credit for a steal, two points, and my field goal percentage went up slightly." That's nice and all, but what happens when your running back explodes for a 50-yard TD? When your defense returns an interception for a touchdown? When your quarterback and receiver happen to be teammates and hook up for score? You can gain big points in a hurry.

Injury Reports. What started as a nice piece of information for regular gamblers has become invaluable to fantasy players as well. You can find out easily if a player is out, doubtful, questionable, or probable, and usually a few days before Sunday. In basketball, you often find out about injuries after the game has started, when it's too late to do anything about. Additionally, a basketball player is far more likely to sit out a game with minor injuries or "flu-like symptoms." That's what happens when you have 82 games instead of 16.

Anyone can play. If you're in just one football league, it's so easy to keep track of it. All you have to remember is what day(s) you can pick up free agents, and you can then spend about five minutes making your moves for the week. You can win a league without doing much more than that. Even better, you can set up a football league very easily. We have one up and running in my office. I guarantee if I tried to do fantasy basketball in my office, I wouldn't get any more than three or four players.

Bye weeks. Ok, I hate bye weeks, but they do add a little strategy. I have a key week 10 battle against a rival, but my QB is on a bye. I had to make a trade to pick up a second quarterback just because I can't let Damian beat me. The closest fantasy basketball comes to this is when a player is playing only one or two games. Still, you wouldn't bench Chris Paul if he only had two games this week, would you?

Comments

By: daskias
On: 11/7/2009 12:48:00 PM
To paraphrase this blog: Fantasy football is the most basic and boring of all the major fantasy sports. It requires very little attention, very little strategy and even a monkey can play! Fantasy football is definately what the D-League is to the NBA.
 
By: jtr5708
On: 11/7/2009 2:43:00 PM
I don't think you did this blog entry very much justice with your paraphrasing. Yes, everybody can play in a basic 8-10 team football league but try a 14+ team league that starts 3WR or even worse, a 12-team league that starts 2 QBS and 2 DST. I think we can all agree that every single fantasy sport has certain characteristics and nuances that make it unique and interesting.
 
By: Kenn Ruby
On: 11/7/2009 2:56:00 PM
Just for the record, I love fantasy football and fantasy basketball, but I like fantasy baseball the best. They all have positives and negatives, but they're all fun to play.
 
By: jtr5708
On: 11/7/2009 5:04:00 PM
I'd be hard pressed to pick between fantasy football and baseball. I love them both for different reasons. Baseball is more of a marathon where football is a sprint to the finish line.
 
By: Kevin Payne
On: 11/7/2009 6:05:00 PM
Both good pieces Kenn. I love both, but it's like basketball is a small fix each day while football is the big payoff once a week. Sounds weird, I know.
 
By: nayfel
On: 11/7/2009 8:31:00 PM
When I was younger, any auction would get me hyped and fantasy football was still a big deal to me. Back then, I was playing fantasy roto; maybe I stopped caring because I have transferred to H2H. I have a partner in at least 1 of each sport and the one that I don't bother with is football. Most of the time, our discussions on what we should do are basic and it comes down to "who should we start, the questionable guy or the crappy guy in a time share"? That just doesn't do it for me anymore.
 
By: The Professor
On: 11/8/2009 3:37:00 AM
The moral to the story, of course, is simply to play points-based head-to-head fantasy basketball. That way you get the benefits of football (1 opponent, binary victories, easy game play) while still enjoying the joy that is basketball.
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

NFL Notes
A look around the league regarding Week 10:
Week 10 Observations
  • We've beaten to death Bill Belichick's decision to go for it on 4th and 2 in Sunday night's game (the best take on it I've seen is here), but the real takeaway is how much Cris Collinsworth, Al Michaels, Tony Dungy and Rodney Harrison felt it was their duty to spout the conventional wisdom without even attempting to analyze Belichick's basis for the decision. Throw in Bob Costas, and it's appalling that five guys collectively making more than $10 million a year to interpret the sport for us didn't even consider the issue from a probability standpoint. Sadly, the NBC crew is probably the best one on TV. (Update: Jon Gruden just defended Belichick's call on MNF - good for him).
  • Dominant Offense but Shaky Defense...Barkley and Dirk
    This topic is a spin-off from the Michael Jordan thread of last week.  In the excellent discussion on that thread a mini-debate broke out as to how Charles Barkley compares to Kevin Garnett.  The gist of the brief debate was to question whether Barkley was enough better than Garnett offensively to make them comparable in value as overall players despite Garnett’s huge defensive advantages.  The thing is, though, to me there is a much better comp for Barkley in this generation than Garnett:  Dirk Nowitzki.
    What is Iverson's Legacy?
    What are we talking 'bout? We're talking 'bout *IVERSON*.
    Jennings vs Rose
    Last year Derrick Rose was the NBA Rookie of the Year.  One year later, would you take him over current rookie point guard phenom Brandon Jennings?

    RSS Feeds