ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

Pay Attention to Opposing Defenses? Or just the Celtics

In my last Hoops Lab I suggested paying attention to opposing defenses when setting your starting line-ups.  Specifically, I suggested keeping an eye on the Celtics, Cavs, and Spurs as teams that could potentially hurt your player's numbers.  Five days into the season, how is that philosophy panning out?

Well, through ten combined games thus far those three teams have only given up one 100-point game and opponents are averaging only 88.2 points/game against them.  In reality, though, it is the Celtics that are pulling those numbers down as they have given up only 79 ppg while the Spurs are giving up 94 ppg and the Cavs 90.5 ppg.

But more specifically on the fantasy front, the Spurs haven't done much to affect the production of the likely fantasy starters on the opposing teams.  The usual suspects all performed about to expectations.  The Cavs somewhat slowed the Bobcats, but in their other three games they didn't do much that would make you bench someone.  But the Celtics?

Through three games, the Celtics have given up exactly one 20-point game...to LeBron James.  They have also given up more than four assists to exactly one opposing starter...to that LeBron guy again.  Outside of LeBron, here are the offensive roto numbers for all 14 other starters:

Luol Deng: 4 points, 2/8 FG, 0 ast
Ty Thomas: 10 points, 3/7 FG, 0 ast
Joakim Noah: 16 points, 7/10 FG, 4 ast
John Salmons: 8 points, 2/14 FG (1 trey), 1 ast
Derrick Rose: 10 points, 4/8 FG, 2 ast

Gerald Wallace: 10 points, 3/9 FG, 0 ast
Boris Diaw: 6 points, 3/7 FG, 2 ast
Tyson Chandler: 0 points, 0/5 FG, 0 ast
Stephen Graham: 5 points, 2/11 FG, 0 ast
Ray Felton: 9 points, 3/11 FG, 3 ast

Anderson Varejao: 9 points, 3/9 FG, 1 ast
Shaquille O'Neal: 10 points, 5/11 FG, 1 ast
Mo Williams: 12 points, 3/8 FG, 3 ast
Anthony Parker: 10 points, 3/9 FG (2 treys), 4 asts

For those that don't want to read all those numbers let me sum it up for you: utter demolition.  Those 14 starters are averaging 8.5 points on (43/127) 33.9% FG with three treys TOTAL.  And if you look at those names, at least 11 of them are potential fantasy starters in most leagues and possibly 13 of them as Parker and Varejao get run in some deeper leagues.

Now, obviously the Celtics have to slow down on defense at some point...don't they?  But even so, it is quite evident that they have the capacity to blank opponents on at least a semi-regular basis.  So for now, I guess I'll modify my original premise to: pay attention to when your team members are playing the CELTICS.  If you've got a superstar like LeBron or even your top few draft picks then obviously you play them no matter the opponent.  But if you've got two relatively equal players and one is playing the Celtics while the other is playing...pretty much anyone else, you might consider starting the one that isn't facing the team whose stated goal is to be the best defense in NBA history.

Comments

By: zoso1699
On: 11/1/2009 6:44:00 AM
good point and easily overlooked. garnett has been a huge difference maker and should only get better as he gets his timing and strength back. i think rondo's development as well with his perimeter defense. this team looks very impressive in the early going.
 
By: Charlie Zegers
On: 11/3/2009 7:28:00 AM
Be interesting to see if they can maintain this level of intensity. If I remember correctly, the Lakers were similarly dominant on D at the start of last season, but it didn't last all year.
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

NFL Notes
A look around the league regarding Week 10:
Week 10 Observations
  • We've beaten to death Bill Belichick's decision to go for it on 4th and 2 in Sunday night's game (the best take on it I've seen is here), but the real takeaway is how much Cris Collinsworth, Al Michaels, Tony Dungy and Rodney Harrison felt it was their duty to spout the conventional wisdom without even attempting to analyze Belichick's basis for the decision. Throw in Bob Costas, and it's appalling that five guys collectively making more than $10 million a year to interpret the sport for us didn't even consider the issue from a probability standpoint. Sadly, the NBC crew is probably the best one on TV. (Update: Jon Gruden just defended Belichick's call on MNF - good for him).
  • Dominant Offense but Shaky Defense...Barkley and Dirk
    This topic is a spin-off from the Michael Jordan thread of last week.  In the excellent discussion on that thread a mini-debate broke out as to how Charles Barkley compares to Kevin Garnett.  The gist of the brief debate was to question whether Barkley was enough better than Garnett offensively to make them comparable in value as overall players despite Garnett’s huge defensive advantages.  The thing is, though, to me there is a much better comp for Barkley in this generation than Garnett:  Dirk Nowitzki.
    What is Iverson's Legacy?
    What are we talking 'bout? We're talking 'bout *IVERSON*.
    Jennings vs Rose
    Last year Derrick Rose was the NBA Rookie of the Year.  One year later, would you take him over current rookie point guard phenom Brandon Jennings?

    RSS Feeds