ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

NFL Notes


It’s never easy to project next season just after this one ended, especially with a new coaching staff taking over, but you have to think Fred Jackson’s Week 17 performance put a stamp on him being Buffalo’s true workhorse moving forward. Marshawn Lynch’s presence still causes concern, dropping him from first round consideration, but Jackson could be a second round pick in fantasy leagues in 2010…I’d let others make Reggie Wayne a top-five WR selection next season and take Pierre Garcon much later…Over the last five quarters, Curtis Painter has completed 28.6 percent of his passes for a 3.0 YPA mark. He also committed four turnovers without a TD. Of course, his opponents were two of the best secondaries in football, but still, that’s strikingly bad. After resting its starters in the second half of Week 16, what was Indy thinking having Peyton Manning attempt 18 passes last week?

No team has ever won the Super Bowl after finishing the regular season with two straight losses, something both No. 1 seeds have done this year, including the Saints dropping their final three games. To say they are limping into the playoffs would be an understatement…The Panthers would be fools not to enter 2010 with Matt Moore as their starting quarterback. Sure, the sample size has been small, but Moore just ended the season with an 8:0 TD:INT ratio with a 7.8 YPA mark over the final four contests. Three of the four opponents made the playoffs (the other being the Giants), and he didn’t have Steve Smith for one of them either. And if you want to talk sample size, how about Jake Delhomme’s last 12 games, when he’s committed 27 turnovers to just eight touchdowns.

Chris Jennings had one of the best runs of the season Sunday, but when it comes to Cleveland running backs, what more can be said about Jerome Harrison? It’s a joke he was planted on the bench so long. And while there’s no guarantee he could withstand a 350-carry type season, he ended the year by setting an NFL-record with 106 rushing attempts over the final three games – the most ever by a back over a three-game stretch…Over the last five games of the year, Mike Sims-Walker totaled just 12 catches for 129 yards with one touchdown, so he really struggled to finish the season, perhaps keeping his price tag down at 2010 draft tables.

Leave it to Jay Cutler to toss eight touchdowns to just one interception over the last two games, reminding everyone of his still vast potential. Especially if the recent revelation that Matt Forte suffered an MCL sprain in the middle of the year affected his performance more than we realized, he, Cutler and Greg Olsen should all be good targets in fantasy leagues next season…The Lions are 2-30 over the past two years – the worst stretch in NFL history (and yet they don’t even get the No. 1 pick in 2010’s draft).

Good luck trying to handicap Houston’s backfield next year. I’m still a Steve Slaton fan, and he might represent a good buy-low opportunity, but the Texans probably view him strictly as a change-of-pace type used extensively in passing situations, and undrafted Arian Foster impressed in between fumbles. To wit, the Pats entered last week having allowed an NFL-low four rushing scores on the year, yet Foster hit pay dirt twice Sunday (of course, New England’s D-line wasn’t at full strength, but still). Houston’s defense quietly improved over the second half of the year, and if not for some crazy last second losses, this 9-7 team could have easily been 11-5 this year. With continuity in the coaching staff and system, if Matt Schaub, Andre Johnson and Owen Daniels stay healthy in 2010, a playoff appearance should finally result…Interesting decision by Bill Belichick to play Tom Brady but remove him during both two-minute drills last week, the thought being to eliminate risk in obvious passing situations. What a devastating injury to Wes Welker (and how crazy was it that it once again involved Bernard Pollard?), and anyone who thinks Julian Edelman is a reasonable facsimile is way off.

Scary hit taken by Pat White. Weird he was ahead of Tyler Thigpen on the depth chart to begin with though. I’ve never seen a more conservative offense with White in. Chad Henne’s “eye” injury was clearly a euphemism for concussion…If you want to draft Rashard Mendenhall in fantasy leagues next year, it will likely cost a top-eight pick.

The toughest opponent in the NFL might very well be the Vikings when playing in Minnesota. They have a lot of warts and benefitted from a very easy schedule, but with the Saints looking extremely vulnerable, don’t be surprised by a deep run in the playoffs from the Vikes. Sidney Rice is a top-three WR in postseason fantasy leagues…Everyone keeps talking about Brandon Jacobs being soft, but if the guy really suffered a fairly serious knee injury Week 1, can we really fault him for his lackluster season? Of course, he seems to suffer a knee injury every year, so it's not like I'm targeting him in fantasy leagues in 2010.

I love Antonio Gates and Dallas Clark, but I’d have a real hard time not ranking Vernon Davis as the No. 1 tight end in 2010…Ndamukong Suh looks can’t-miss, but he’s a defensive tackle. How can the Rams not take a quarterback?...San Francisco allowed 6.75 points per game during second halves this season, easily an NFL-low…It would be a big mistake if the 49ers entered 2010 completely content with Alex Smith as their quarterback of the future.

It’s too bad Antonio Bryant has likely talked himself off another team, because if he returned with a fully healthy knee next year, he would be just the weapon Josh Freeman could really grow with…If you examine the Falcons’ schedule and account for injuries, this is a team that will be dangerous in the NFC in 2010.

Dallas hadn’t scored a touchdown on its opening drive of any game over the first 13 contests this season and then did so in each of the final three games to close out the year. Go figure…The more I think about it, the more I’m willing to rank Miles Austin as the No. 3 wide receiver for fantasy purposes in 2010….The Eagles looked nothing short of terrible Sunday, but don’t be surprised if Saturday night’s wild card matchup is much more competitive, with a Philly win a possibility…You’ll hear people talk about how hard it is to beat a team three times in one season, and while that may be true because it’s rather rare, it’s not that hard once the first two games are out of the way. In fact, when teams meet for the third time in a given season, the squad that has won the first two times has a better winning percentage in game three than the one who has dropped the first two contests.

It’s safe to say the Cardinals will be in a lot of trouble when Matt Leinart becomes QB1. Considering Kurt Warner will be 39 years old when next season starts, that prospect may be sooner than any prospective Larry Fitzgerald, Anquan Boldin and Beanie Wells fantasy owner would like…The Packers are a weird team. On one hand, they were the most penalized team in the NFL this year and have a bad special teams unit. On the other, they led the league in turnover ratio and had the second-best point differential in football this season. They could easily lose this week to a team that didn’t try while watching GB utilize its playbook last Sunday, but the Packers also wouldn’t surprise if they made the Super Bowl either.

I won’t say the Broncos didn’t miss Brandon Marshall last week, but Jabar Gaffney sure made Eddie Royal look bad with a big performance. Marshall will be tough to rank in fantasy leagues next year, but hopefully his situation will become clearer come August…Tim Castille’s halfback pass was honestly one of the five-worst throws I’ve ever seen in any football game of my life last week, emphasized by the announcer suggesting the cornerback should have “called for a fair catch” on the throw.  I get it – you’re not a quarterback and not used to throwing in an NFL game. I don’t care. If the trick play doesn’t result in someone wide open, just throw the ball 10 rows deep in the stands. This isn’t rocket science…I‘ve been guilty in the past of overrating running backs similar to what Jamaal Charles has done – huge performances (on a bad team) down the stretch (and against weak competition) with little to no history. That said, I have Charles as the No. 6 overall pick in 2010 drafts, and I stand by it. He’s the real deal.

JaMarcus Russell didn’t show up to the Raiders’ season-ending meeting because he wanted to go to Vegas instead? I can’t say I blame him, but he’s now officially one of the five biggest busts in NFL history…Willis McGahee was the most worthless fantasy player to ever score 14 touchdowns in a given season this year…I keep hearing Joe Flacco getting killed in the media, but this is a sophomore QB who has posted a 7.9 YPA and a 7:1 TD:INT ratio over his past four games despite a bad outing in Oakland last week. His season YPA (7.2), TDs (21) and completion percentage (63.1) all rank in the top half of the league; he’s played one game indoors this season while facing an extremely difficult schedule with one of the worst receiving corps in football. Flacco deserves far more credit than he gets.

While I wasn’t impressed with Mike Shanahan the GM (at least not toward the end of his Denver tenure), it’s hard to deny he wasn’t a good coach, so I can’t wait to see what he does with this Washington roster, especially on offense. Good luck in that division…Here’s a Peter King quote from his MMQB column this week: “This is the year (Philip) Rivers joined the elite of NFL quarterbacks.” Look, I still read King and don’t care if he makes me cringe from time-to-time; the guy means well and works hard, but that comment is indefensible. I picked Rivers as the MVP last season. Dude had 34 TD passes (which tied for the NFL-lead, but he had six fewer INTs) with an 8.4 YPA that easily led the league. Call me crazy, but I think he entered the “elite” last season. Not to kill the guy, but later in King’s article, he argues Tim Tebow should be selected high because Joe Montana and Tom Brady lasted far too long during their drafts. Huh?

I love how many in Seattle are shocked by T.J. Houshmandzadeh being a bust during his first year as a Seahawk when he averaged 10.2 and 9.8 yards-per-catch during his last two seasons in Cincinnati. I mean, he’s always had good hands and had to deal with a terrible QB in his final season with the Bengals, but he’s eclipsed 1,000 yards receiving just twice during his eight-year career – never reaching 1,150 yards. He’s an OK possession receiver in a good offense and nothing more…That holding call should NOT have been called. Chris Johnson was screwed.

I’m beginning to think the Bengals didn’t show up to play Sunday night. Now that was embarrassing. That said, don’t be shocked if Cincy wins this week…The Jets have unquestionably the best defense in the NFL this season, and the No. 1 ranked run offense as well (I like YPC better than YPG, but still, their rushing attack is legit either way), but unfortunately, this is a passing league, so they have little chance of advancing past the divisional round of the AFC playoffs (and I’m a big Rex Ryan fan too).

Comments

By: Scott Pianowski
On: 1/5/2010 11:11:00 PM
I'm totally with you on that "it's hard to beat a team three times" jibberish. There's a major difference between the probability of a series of events before anything happens and the probability of a single event after other results are in. Bill Simmons fell into that trap when he tried to analyze the Bill Belichick decision; just because it might be hard to imagine events A, B, C and D all happening, you only consider the probability of D alone if the first three things are out of the way. (I bet there's a tidy term from logicians that sums up this concept, but I don't know what it is; maybe it's just an offshoot gambler's fallacy, the misguided idea that you better hurry up and bet on red because the last eight roulette spins have come up black. Of course a roulette wheel in theory is unbiased, but in football Team A might just be better, or favorable in matchup, to Team B).

I read King semi-regularly and he drives me nuts, too. One of his major flaws is the tendency to assume that anything he just realized must be a new thing. Hey, I just realized Philip Rivers is really friggin' good. I must be first to this party. It's annoying, just like his name dropping is annoying and his insistence on ties whenever he ranks anything (pick a side, already) is annoying. He's probably got the best access in the league and he certainly is prolific, but he's not a great journalist.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 1/6/2010 12:34:00 AM
A stat worth mentioning: Aaron Rodgers was sacked just nine times in the final seven weeks, after being dropped 41 times in the first nine games. That's mostly Rodgers getting better pocket awareness, with the line also playing a little better. Being ahead helps, too; teams can't pin their ears back and attack the pocket. But mostly, I think it's a new starter (Year 2) getting more experience and improving.
 
By: Kevin Payne
On: 1/6/2010 4:20:00 AM
Re:Suh-they had the cornerback from Tennessee ranked higher than him according to some expert. I don't see how you pass him up. If I'm STL, I take Suh and address QB later in the draft.
 
By: Mark Stopa
On: 1/6/2010 4:34:00 AM
I can't see paying a DT the type of money you'd have to pay the first overall pick. If I were the Rams, I'd trade down to number 2, knowing the Lions aren't going to take a QB, and get the QB that you want for a lower price. Any other picks you acquire in the process are gravy.

The thing that everyone misses when they talk about "it's hard to beat a team three times" is this - if a team already won the first two games, doesn't that make it more likely they're just the better team?
 
By: Trumpetbdw
On: 1/6/2010 5:58:00 AM
In matchups involving teams that have played 3 times, the team that won the first two contests in the regular season have also won the third game 12 out of 19 times. Pittsburgh did it to Baltimore last season.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 1/6/2010 6:32:00 AM
The 1999 Jaguars went 15-3 including the playoffs, with all three losses coming to the Titans (20-19, 41-14 and then 33-14 in the postseason). After the Jags went down in the AFC Championship Game, Fred Taylor said "I still think we're better." Ah, Freddy.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 1/6/2010 9:48:00 AM
I would take Suh and get a QB later. QBs are almost impossible to scout anyway. And a DT who can destroy the run and collapse the pocket is worth the money. The DEs will get a lot more sacks when the DT gets double-teamed.
 
By: Dave Regan
On: 1/6/2010 10:44:00 AM
I would love to see my Rams trade down. Their lack of ability to draft DTs (Jimmy Kennedy for example, Damoine Lewis) and see them pan out is a concern. I know, Suh may be the next Warren Sapp, so it's not fair to say that just because Player A from 2001 didn't work out that Player B from 2010 will flop as well. Anyway, for me, there is no QB worth taking #1 or #2, so I do this:

Rd 1: Suh
Rd 2: QB - McCoy, Snead, or Pike
Rd 3 - 7 - stock up on LBs, a WR, and a late-round RB

P.S. Jimmy Clausen as a top-2 pick worries me. Rick Mirer?
 
By: Kevin Payne
On: 1/6/2010 12:12:00 PM
The Rams will take Suh but possibly Berry (TEN), there's too many question marks among the QBs in this draft. Compared to Haynesworth's contract, they're getting a huge discount if they take Suh. If the Lions are really in the market for a DT, they'll take McCoy who probably won't last past the first five picks.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 1/6/2010 12:12:00 PM
Pianow - That's a great stat regarding GB and sacks. It's hard not to like the Pack this week, but it seems like EVERYONE does, meaning it's the sucker side. I really hope I'm wrong tho, b/c I'm heavily invested in them in my playoff league and bet on them to win the SB before the season.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 1/6/2010 12:15:00 PM
I hear you guys about QBs being crap shoots, but plenty of D-lineman have been busts too. (Dorsey and T. Jackson are two recent examples off the top of my head). But again, if Suh is in a true class by himself and appears a sure thing, I can see it. But the Rams really, really need a QB. I'll say this - I'd bet good money Shanahan uses his early pick on a quarterback.
 
By: herbilk
On: 1/6/2010 12:45:00 PM
As an aside to Rodgers' sack totals, mid-season is also when Mark Tauscher replaced Alan Barbre at right tackle on the offensive line. It's true that Rodgers has done a better job of getting rid of the ball, but if there was ever a stats that says "you stink", it's this one: Sacks with Alan Barbre as a starter in the OL - 41, sacks without Barber as a starter - 9.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 1/6/2010 1:12:00 PM
I'm not sure there is always a sucker side in the playoffs - the lines seem a lot tighter generally.
 
By: Kevin Payne
On: 1/6/2010 2:54:00 PM
Suh vs. Dorsey (I know I'm killing this) college senior year stats:

Dorsey-69 tackles, 12.5 tackles for loss, 7 sacks
Suh-85 tackles, 24 tackles for loss, 12 sacks.

Suh is also 3 inches talles, same weight. Dorsey was also overhyped after winning the National Championship and could still turn things around.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 1/6/2010 3:48:00 PM
But when a DT is a bust, it doesn't ruin your whole franchise for years. When a QB is a bust, you give the guy 2-3 years to prove otherwise, and he takes your team down with him. It's not just the opportunity cost of the pick as it is with the DT.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 1/6/2010 4:13:00 PM
I think teams have to look at it the other way, Chris, focus on the potential of setting up your team at the most important position for 6-8 years (or more). If you think there's a star quarterback there and you don't have that position filled, you have to strongly consider it. Focus on what could go right.

That said, if I wasn't floored at the player at No. 1 overall (QB or otherwise) I would trade down. I think Suh is a borderline call.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 1/6/2010 5:02:00 PM
If the GM has a read on a QB and thinks he'll be great (like Ernie Accorsi did with Eli Manning), then by all means do what you can to get him. But I'm not drafting the best QB in a given class high just because he could be with us awhile. I don't know enough about college ball to comment on the particular QBs in this class. From what I've read, none stand out nearly to the extent Suh does - supposedly a once in a generation defensive player.
 
By: jhermann
On: 1/6/2010 5:58:00 PM
As a Rams fan since '73, I have lived through some recent bad seasons. The Rams have taken a few DT's in recent years and the team has been burned (e.g., Kennedy, who ironically is now successful on the Vikes). The Rams should STILL take the best player available. When your pick is so high, you have little choice to take the best player available, not based such a vital decision based on need. And, by the way, the Rams are weak at DT. In fact, the Rams are relatively weak at every position with the exception of RB. So, the Rams should take Suh, because he is currently far and away the best player available. If there is a better player in the draft, the Rams should take that player. The team can take a QB in Round 2. There should be some viable QB's available at 2.1 for the Rams, and the Rams can pick-up a bridge QB until the young draft pick develops. I think Drew Brees was an early 2nd round QB. I agree with Liss that QB's are too much of a gamble when the Rams are in shambles. And, that is an understatement... On an unrelated point, DDD, you use the word sample incorrectly. A sample is a portion of the population. So, it is not a sample, but a small population (or, a small n). It may or may not be representative, but it is all the data that is available. ... Lastly, Chris Long has finally become a solid DE, so Suh will make Long better. And, the Rams MUST lock up Atogwe to a long term contract, as he is the Rams' best defensive player. My two cents.
 
By: Kevin Payne
On: 1/6/2010 6:09:00 PM
Clausen will get the same ringing endorsement Brady Quinn got, and we know how he's doing. Bradford's shoulder is a question mark and it's arguable that the best QB in college will be playing in Washington next year. There isn't a QB worth an overall first pick. That being said I wouldn't be shocked to see them take Berry though, he did play for some guy named Monte Kiffin this year.
 
By: Jacobdk
On: 1/6/2010 7:07:00 PM
jhermann... what if the "best player available" was a kicker?
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 1/6/2010 7:18:00 PM
Marginal replacement value has to come into play, which would always eliminate any kicker from the discussion.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 1/6/2010 7:20:00 PM
To be clear, if I were the Rams, I would shop the pick, and if there wasn't a package I really liked, I'd take Suh anyway. I would not take a quarterback No. 1 in this draft.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 1/6/2010 8:40:00 PM
jhermann - Just because Drew Brees went in the second round doesn't mean waiting on a QB until then is the right call. Should they just wait until round 6 because that's when Brady went? That said, I can understand the Suh pick. But they should try to trade for Kolb then - aggressively...So there's no such thing as a "small sample size?" I should be saying it's a "small population" when talking about games played?
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 1/6/2010 8:44:00 PM
Payne - Just because Quinn sucks doesn't necessarily mean Clausen will be a bust - dude was playing with torn ligaments in his toe all season and put up some legit stats. Still, I get it - if no QB is worthy, no matter how bad you need the position, no need to reach for someone even more unsure than usual for an already shaky position to project. I'll see your Locker and raise you an Andrew Luck, who will turn out to be the best of this whole bunch.
 
By: jhermann
On: 1/7/2010 6:33:00 AM
Jacob, Theoretically yes!!! And, of course, this applies to the #1 overall pick, not to all picks. Do you really think that the best overall pick is a PK? I know need is important, but the cost is much greater if you make the wrong pick at #1. Given that the Rams have picked #2, #2, and #1 the last three years shows a need for the player that will make the biggest impact with the least amount of bust potential. At this time, Suh meets this criterion, not Clausen. Clausen is not the poster child for a sure thing. I think many see less problems with taking a QB early after the Ryan/Flacco choices in the 2008 draft. But, Ryan/Flacco are the exceptions, not the rule. But, a QB bust with the #1 pick (and the attendant costs) could set the Rams organization in an even more downward spiral -- if that is possible. I agree with Liss on this issue.
 
By: jhermann
On: 1/7/2010 6:36:00 AM
Scott, I would definitely want the Rams to trade down if the team received a fair deal for the #1. The problem is that the trade calculator for the #1 pick is so skewed. When you have as many problems as the Rams, you need numerous picks to repair years of neglect to what once was a proud organization.
 
By: jhermann
On: 1/7/2010 6:42:00 AM
DDD, If the Rams could get Kevin Kolb from the Eagles, sign me up yesterday. That kid has talent. The Rams are actually in great cap shape and can pursue several players in free agency. It all depends on whether it is a capped or uncapped year...Regarding a sample, it is a portion of the population. So, J. Charles has a small population or number of cases to draw a conclusion. If we took a random sample or 2 of the games he started out of all the games, then we have a sample of the population. The big question is choosing a representative sample of the population. The difference between a sample and population is called a sampling error, and you usually need a large number of cases to find it. But, if you only have one case, it is a population, not a sample. My day job is professor, and my research has included mathematical modeling.
 
By: Jacobdk
On: 1/7/2010 9:04:00 AM
jesus, those were some good answers! i know i'll be more aware of my use of "sample size" from now on (though if I start referring to "population" no one but you will know what the hell I'm talking about).

my only point (which seems overly simplistic now) was that football is one sport where some positions are more important than others, and it's a tricky thing to factor in.
 
By: jhermann
On: 1/7/2010 9:39:00 AM
Jacob, Point well taken about all positions are not equal in the NFL. Some position have higher value than others. A PK, punter, and long snapper do not have much chance of being an overall top pick. A LT, DE, DT, RB, QB, and even WR have more of a chance of being chosen #1 overall. But, the Rams need the surest player the team can find, because the Rams did value a PK too much. When Linehan was head coach, he announced that the team ascertained the best player in free agency by signing Josh Brown to a record contract for a PK. No wonder the Rams pick #2, #2, and #1 the last three years. The Rams need someone like Osi in free agency who is unhappy with the G-Men. And, if the Rams can get Kolb for a 2nd and 5th rounder, the Rams would be in better shape.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 1/7/2010 10:06:00 AM
If a kicker was 100 percent from 50, 90 percent from 60, 80 percent from 70, and 50 percent from 70-plus, could execute perfect onside kicks and obviously create automatic touchbacks, then he'd be worth taking No. 1. I know the Raiders wouldn't be able to resist. I thought the error was saying: "small sample size" when it should be "small sample." The population being all games that Charles has played, the sample being the eight or so when he was getting a big workload. Charles was the second best back in the league over the second half, albeit in a small sample. And if I said: "Charles should be an early first round pick - the data clearly demonstrate that." You might reply: "It looks that way, but you have a sample size issue," meaning the sample was not large enough to warrant such a firm conclusion. Correct me if I'm wrong here.
 
By: jhermann
On: 1/7/2010 10:23:00 AM
Chris, Funny comment about the PK and the Raiders. And, I am sure Al Davis would be especially happy if the PK ran a 4.3. Regarding the issue of sample, it is frequently used incorrectly. And, it depends on what is the population. Is it all cases where Charles played? If so, then DDD is correct by using sample, but we do not know how Charles could handle a full workload over a season so it would be an unrepresentative sample because we would be only choosing certain cases. Is it all cases where Charles was a feature back or starting in 2009, then the answer is that it is a population. So, it depends on the definition of population. A sample is a portion of the population -- representative or not (or a straw poll) I do believe that DDD was using Charles as the feature back/starting appearances as the only unit of analysis, which makes the use of the word sample incorrect in this case. But, I may be wrong. I am sorry if I bogged down his NFL notes with this tangent. Maybe I am a purist when it comes to use of the term. But, most important, I pray to the football gods that the Rams do not pick so early again for some time. And, Suh appears to be the ticket out of the high draft pick syndrome. At least, I hope.
 
By: Jacobdk
On: 1/7/2010 10:58:00 AM
I thought the "sample size" issue was with Matt Moore. And my problem with that was the "Sure, the small sample size has been small, but..." because 4 games is 4 games. And yes, 3 of the 4 were against playoff teams, but one of them (NO) had nothing to play for, and in another game (at NE) Moore was 15-30 in a 20-10 loss. Not to mention the exclusion of his 5th start. So he had one meaningful strong game (against MINN) in five. Yes, I'd give him the job over Jake Delhomme, but I'd want to bring in some competition too.
 
By: NoWayOut
On: 1/7/2010 1:49:00 PM
I'm curious what you guys make of the Chiefs hiring Weis as OC and how you see that effecting Jamaal Charles' value? Especially in keeper and PPR formats assuming they don't bring in anybody else through free agency or the draft to cut into his workload.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 1/7/2010 3:07:00 PM
Good stuff regarding sample vs. population, and rest assured, I'll get it wrong next time too.

jacobdk - I hear you about Matt Moore. But an 8:0 TD:INT ratio with a 7.8 YPA impresses regardless of opponents. Those are legit numbers. And he looked good by the naked eye as well. I'm not saying he's a sure thing, and I'm all for more competition, but Moore at least deserves a leg up on Delhomme, at a minimum. Moore would hardly be the first undrafted QB to come out of nowhere and succeed. He's familiar with Carolina's system and is still relatively young too.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 1/7/2010 3:09:00 PM
NoWayOut - I wouldn't change my opinion much regarding Charles. Maybe it's a slightly good thing, since Weis usually does get his QB to produce. A better offense should help, and since Charles can catch, he seems like a good fit for Weis' system.
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

How BABIP Affects the Value of Strikeouts and Walks
The league-average batting-average-on-balls-in-play (BABIP) has been on a downward trajectory for the last half decade, something that has implications for the values of different at-bat outcomes. BABIP is down precipitously this season (.289), though it's hard to tell to what extent that's due to all the shifting defenses (better data on where balls are hit have enabled this), or is simply just an April cold-weather/small sample anomaly.
NHL Playoff Observations -- Monday
Just a few things that caught my eye ...
  • Alexander Semin was on the wrong side of the grocery stick most of the night. You know, that spot between the back-up goalie and the rest of the team ... the one where the dead wood goes so it doesn't get in the way of on-the-fly changes.
  • Honey badger don't care. Honey badger doesn't give a $%!&.  T.J. Oshie gave up four inches and 50 pounds to Dustin Penner, but he didn't care. Then again, honey badger didn't care when he hit Rick Nash a few years ago, either. I wonder if the NHL would let me get a Blues #74 jersey with Honey Badger on the back.
Buy Lowest
Every year, we hear advice about how it's time to "buy low" on struggling stars like Albert Pujols, Giancarlo Stanton and Robinson Cano. "Get them now for cheap before they heat up!" Except that the market for superstars - at least in competitive leagues - usually doesn't move much after one bad month. (Whether it should in these cases is another question). It's more likely that the Pujols and Stanton owners are doubling down, figuring that only a hot streak from a player of that caliber can undo the damage that's already been done.

That doesn't mean you can't take advantage of the market's early overreaction, but you'll have to aim a little lower and take on quite a bit more risk. The players listed below are those who should be available at an actual discount.

Fantasy Rookies
Now that the 2012 NFL Draft is complete and rosters look about the way they will when training camps open in late July, it’s time to start the speculation train full steam ahead to fantasy draft days. Many players taken in this class will have a fantasy impact, some immediate, some in small spurts as rookies and some not for years to come.
Cowboys Draft: First Blush Thoughts
My initial reactions to the 2012 Dallas draft crop.

RSS Feeds