ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

MLB Thoughts and Observations

I haven't heard a lot of talk about Nate Schierholz - surprising especially from DDD who's a Giants fan. Schierholz isn't a super prospect, but he posted an OPS of well over .900 for two years in a row at Triple-A and is still just 25. He'll run a bit, hit for average and a little pop. He won't take a walk, but that's not a bad thing in fantasy, especially since his contact rate isn't a problem. Got him in the RotoWire Staff 18-team keeper league a couple weeks ago for $1 - which shows how forgotten he'd been. I'd suggest picking up players like James McDonald, Matt LaPorta, Chase Headley and Clay Buchholz - even in deeper one-year mixed leagues because you never know when one will break out, and you want to be there before it happens.

Clayton Kershaw hasn't entirely turned the corner yet, but given his strikeout rate, home park and division, his downside is limited, and his upside is not - even this year. Even if he doesn't get better, Kershaw's peripherals stack up to teammate Chad Billingsley's.

While winning a shallow league is all about your superstars and breakouts, winning a deep one requires unsung heroes - players you bought on the cheap who make significant contributions. Two huge players in my 17-team Tout league are Miguel Olivo (12 HR, 2 SB, .262 average from a second catcher) and Scott Rolen (41 runs, 4 SB, .332 average). Players like that are huge difference makers in deep leagues, and it's hard not to appreciate them more than the Hanley Ramirez and Mariano Rivera types who are merely doing their jobs.

Apropos of nothing, I have to mention the greatest awards acceptance speech ever. It's from a few months ago, but I watched it again last night, and am more confident than ever it won't be surpassed. If only it had happened at the Oscars...

After Albert Pujols and Hanley Ramirez, who goes third if we were to draft tomorrow? I'd probably take Tim Lincecum who's pitching better this year than last now that he's improved his command. It's funny because Lincecum was available at No. 20 in my home league, but I passed on him. Luckily, I got Carl Crawford who's nearly as valuable in a league with only four pitching categories (no WHIP). B.J. Upton and Crawford both deserve serious consideration in the top five, too along with Joe Mauer, Miguel Cabrera, ARod and a few others. But I think Pujols, Ramirez, Lincecum are the clear top three right now.

We currently have Matt Forte ranked No. 3 overall, but between a minor hamstring injury this spring, his 3.9 yard per carry average and his lack of a multiyear track record, I'm not all that comfortable taking him in that spot. I'd strongly consider taking Larry Fitzgerald instead, particularly in a 2-RB, 3-WR league. Even Maurice Jones-Drew, who everyone loves, is risky as he's never had even 200 carries in a season. I can see a good case for taking Fitzgerald at No 2.

Most of you have probably seen this before, but this guy still cracks me up.

Where do you draft Dirk Nowitzki next season now that his former fiancee has been jailed?. Does he fall into a depression or take it out on the rest of the league? I'm banking on the latter. Seriously, though, you have to feel bad for the guy as it's bad enough to find out something like that without it being public knowledge. (I've never had an ex-girlfriend jailed, but I've been with some that should have been - and may well be by now).

Thanks to an unlucky strand rate and a regression to the mean on BABIP, Gavin Floyd's ERA is higher this year than last, but he's bumped his strikeout rate and ground ball rate, and is allowing far fewer home runs. It's always odd when a smoke and mirrors success, instead coming down to earth, takes a skill leap. Might the same thing happen with Luke Hochevar or Rick Porcello, both of whom have very modest peripherals. Can some short-term luck-based success lead to greater confidence and eventually skill growth in young pitching prospects with good raw stuff?

Finally, I made this post on trade etiquette a month ago, and while it got some comments, it apparently has not changed the hearts and minds of those in my leagues. Few in my home league will ever make a counter offer, and many just ignore offers indefinitely to the point where I have to withdraw them for fear of forgetting about them and having them accepted later after the values have changed. I think in my home league some of the guys are worried that I have some inside info they lack (not true, and if it were, I'd disclose it), but expert leaguers have no such excuse.

Comments

By: Dave Regan
On: 6/30/2009 3:08:00 PM
I'm lukewarm on Schierholtz. Not a lot of power, very little speed, and a .368 BABIP. Then there's the walk rate you mentioned previously. Maybe he's a .300 / 15 HR guy, but while that's certainly valueable in deeper leagues, I'm not sure he can sustain this.

Love everyday normal guy...always cracks me up.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 6/30/2009 3:39:00 PM
It's far more satisfying to get scrub production as opposed to star production. Fully agree. Nick Goings, come on down.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 6/30/2009 3:47:00 PM
We gotta get you in a midseason draft too. Email me the specs and date you want - even if it's a full draft-and-watch - and we'll make it happen.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 6/30/2009 4:37:00 PM
Good stuff, Chris. I had never seen "Everyday Normal Guy." Brilliant.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 6/30/2009 9:11:00 PM
I'd do a midseason draft with a few days notice if we got a full slate, and there were no moves. (A lot to ask, I know). The problem with having 8 teams is that you draft differently based on the parameters. To get a good 12-team midseason cheat sheet you need to have the full 12. But if someone wants to organize it, I'm definitely in. And thanks DDD - I'm sure you love Lincecum as No. 3, though I still wouldn't take him ahead of Hanley or Pujols.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 6/30/2009 9:43:00 PM
Pujols is on a different planet right now. No one else is even in the conversation.
 
By: nayfel
On: 7/1/2009 8:39:00 AM
I don't get the Giants at all. How do they go from not playing a guy to all of a sudden thrusting him into the heart of their lineup after a week? if he wasn't worthy of playing a few weeks ago, why is he all of a sudden worthy of hitting cleanup? I'm a fan, I just hate when managers go from one extreme to the other in a matter of days.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 7/1/2009 10:52:00 AM
I think Hanley's in the conversation, as ridiculous as Pujols is. Hanley has been an absolute RBI machine the last month, he's running again and plays SS. Pujols might be a 60/150/.330/15 guy, but Hanley might be a 35/130/.340/30 guy from shortstop which is more scarce than ever this year.
 
By: nayfel
On: 7/1/2009 12:32:00 PM
What about Mauer? from the C spot, he needs to be the discussion of first round picks.
 
By: tumanic
On: 7/1/2009 12:44:00 PM
Best acceptance speech ever.....I will second that, lol
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 7/1/2009 1:48:00 PM
I mention Mauer as a top-5 candidate above. And I agree that it's odd how teams play or bench guys so completely based on the who's hot. It's like a novice fantasy player chasing last week's stats.
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

NFL Notes
A look around the league regarding Week 10:
Week 10 Observations
  • We've beaten to death Bill Belichick's decision to go for it on 4th and 2 in Sunday night's game (the best take on it I've seen is here), but the real takeaway is how much Cris Collinsworth, Al Michaels, Tony Dungy and Rodney Harrison felt it was their duty to spout the conventional wisdom without even attempting to analyze Belichick's basis for the decision. Throw in Bob Costas, and it's appalling that five guys collectively making more than $10 million a year to interpret the sport for us didn't even consider the issue from a probability standpoint. Sadly, the NBC crew is probably the best one on TV. (Update: Jon Gruden just defended Belichick's call on MNF - good for him).
  • Dominant Offense but Shaky Defense...Barkley and Dirk
    This topic is a spin-off from the Michael Jordan thread of last week.  In the excellent discussion on that thread a mini-debate broke out as to how Charles Barkley compares to Kevin Garnett.  The gist of the brief debate was to question whether Barkley was enough better than Garnett offensively to make them comparable in value as overall players despite Garnett’s huge defensive advantages.  The thing is, though, to me there is a much better comp for Barkley in this generation than Garnett:  Dirk Nowitzki.
    What is Iverson's Legacy?
    What are we talking 'bout? We're talking 'bout *IVERSON*.
    Jennings vs Rose
    Last year Derrick Rose was the NBA Rookie of the Year.  One year later, would you take him over current rookie point guard phenom Brandon Jennings?

    RSS Feeds