ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

MLB Notes

After throwing the most pitches (3,914) in all of baseball last year, I avoided Cole Hamels at the draft table in 2009. And while I’m still concerned with his health moving forward, he’s actually a pretty good trade target right now, especially for teams lower in the standings trying to swing for the fences. He currently sports a 4.98 ERA and 1.47 WHIP, which makes zero sense combined with an elite 4.3:1 K:BB ratio. Looking at his pitch types, he’s throwing his fastball a bit more this season and his curveball less, but his velocity is pretty much the same (90.0 mph compared to 90.4 mph last year), and he claims he feels perfectly fine physically. Actually, his control has improved this season compared to last (1.91 BB/9 versus 2.10) as well as his K rate (8.15 K/9 versus 7.76), and his G/F ratio is a career-best (1.27). With a .371 BABIP (career-mark is .284), a .684 strand rate and a 13.3% HR/F ratio, few pitchers have been unluckier this season. In fact, Hamels’ xFIP (3.38) is the ninth best in MLB, so it’s safe to expect a terrific second half of the season, assuming last year’s workload doesn’t prevent it.

Carl Crawford has been nothing short of fantastic this season, and he’s likely on plenty of fantasy teams leading their league. But I don’t see a big difference in value between him and Jacoby Ellsbury moving forward. Crawford possesses more power, but his career-high in homers is just 18, and he’s only surpassed 11 bombs twice during his career (although he’s almost certain to do so this year). And it’s not as great of a difference as one would think, as Crawford has hit a home run once every 52.6 at-bats throughout his career, while Ellsbury has done so once every 60.5 ABs. Ellsbury already has better plate discipline (20:29 K:BB compared to 26:52), and while Crawford currently holds the advantage in RBI and runs scored, with Ellsbury hitting in Boston’s lineup and Fenway Park, that gap should narrow in the future. After all, Crawford’s career OPS is .770, and Ellsbury’s is .758. I’m not trying to take anything away from Crawford, who has returned to the fantasy elite this year, it’s just that Ellsbury isn’t far behind, and given the choice between the two of who will steal more bases over the rest of the season, my money is on Ellsbury. Of course, I’d happily take B.J. Upton over both of them.

Over his last five starts, Jordan Zimmermann has a 2.12 ERA, 1.01 WHIP and 28:7 K:BB ratio. He has just three wins with a 4.52 ERA on the season, but this rookie has an even better K rate (8.92/9) than Zack Greinke, and his average fastball velocity (93.3 mph) ranks 14th best in baseball. Zimmermann also keeps the ball on the ground (1.18 G/F), and while wins could be elusive pitching for the Nationals, if he qualified, his xFIP (3.35) would be better than pitchers such as Josh Johnson, Felix Hernandez, Yovani Gallardo and Chad Billingsley. It really wouldn’t be too big of a stretch to call Zimmermann a top-30 fantasy starter right now.

If you prorate Joey Votto’s numbers over 162 games, here’s what pace he’s on this season: .366 BA, 30 homers, 134 RBI, 93 runs scored and seven steals, which means he’ll have to be considered during the second round of drafts in 2010. Of course, his .402 BABIP reveals an inevitable decline in average, but this is a 25-year-old who posted a .959 OPS after the All-Star break last season and has recorded a sick 15:20 K:BB ratio over his past 28 games. Votto is actually hitting left-handers better than righties this season, and he plays in a home park that has been the third most conducive to home runs in all of baseball this year. I’d prefer Votto to Adrian Gonzalez or Ryan Howard over the rest of this season.

Jair Jurrjens posted a 1.72 ERA and 1.24 WHIP during June despite an ugly 16:14 K:BB ratio over 31.1 innings, making him a sell-high candidate at the time. While those peripherals suggested a major crash was in store, he’s followed that up with ERAs of 3.38 and 3.68 during May and June, respectively, and a funny thing happened along the way – he started pitching much better. In May he posted a 2.7:1 K:BB ratio, and over his last 41.1 innings, he’s tallied a strong 8.49 K/9 mark (and nearly half those starts came against the Red Sox and Phillies), so superior pitching has negated the supposed regression. It’s just something to note – just because a pitcher has been lucky, doesn’t mean he can’t improve in other areas to avoid an inevitable collapse (Matt Cain is another good example here).

Over his last 28 games, Juan Rivera has 10 homers and 29 RBI. He’s done the majority of his damage against left-handers, posting a massive .407/.478/.814 line with six of his 14 homers versus southpaws over just 59 at-bats, but the stats count all the same. Finally given a chance as a full-time player, he’s taking full advantage of the opportunity, and of all American League hitters who have slugged .515 (like he has) or better this season, he’s struck out the fewest amount of times (26) by a wide margin. In fact, the next closest (Victor Martinez) has fanned 15 more times. Rivera is proving to be a steal in fantasy leagues.

For someone with an 8.64 ERA over his last three starts, the window to sell Jered Weaver high has probably passed, and while a complete collapse is hardly in store, further regression should be expected. Through 90.2 innings this season, he had a 2.08 ERA – this despite worse control and a decreased K rate compared to last year, and since 2007, his G/F ratio is going in the wrong direction (0.73, 0.68, 0.59). A low BABIP (.262), high strand rate (.764) and fortunate HR/F rate (8.8%) has had just as much to do with Weaver’s 2009 breakout as any tangible improvement in pitching ability. Don’t get me wrong, he’s solid, but just realize his xFIP (4.58) ranks 65th among all starters.

Fun fact: Including this year, over the past eight seasons, the pitcher who has faced the toughest schedule (aggregate OPS) has been in the AL East seven times: A.J. Burnett .781 (2009), Matt Garza .767 (2008), Roy Halladay .775 (2007), Josh Beckett .784 (2006), Zack Greinke .767 (2005), Rodrigo Lopez .785 (2004), Victor Zambrano .781 (2003) and Tanyon Sturtze .767 (2002). 

Comments

By: kevinccp
On: 7/2/2009 9:29:00 PM
I have to respectfully disagree with your eval of Ellbury vs. Crawford-your ownership has clouded your opinion. There's no reason to think Ellsbury is going to be better going forward. You have to look at this season (Crawford was plagued by injury last year and you talk Ellsbury's *career* numbers-he's got less than 1000 ABs, hardly two seasons worth. His HR/AB is down from last season, he hits lower in the lineup than Crawford (less ABs), and Crawford's OPS this year is .838 (before last year's injury year he posted 3 straight .802 or higher) vs. .757 Ellsbury. It't not like Crawford is 33, he's 27 and in his prime. Just my opinion-that being said, if you can get a cheaper Ellsbury in a keeper league for a more expensive/optioned Crawford, it's a no-brainer.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 7/2/2009 9:37:00 PM
Good points. And in fact, I was pretty surprised how close their ages were when looking that up, I expected a bigger discrepancy. But I still expect Ellsbury to act as the Red Sox's leadoff man in the future, and like I said, I think he's a better bet for steals from here on out. But I'll concede Crawford is in fact superior - it's just that one takes a top-15 pick, and the other a 3rd/4th round pick, so Ellsbury is the better value.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 7/2/2009 9:51:00 PM
I agree with your general conclusion on Crawford/Ellsbury, but I don't see how we should assume Ellsbury will make up ground on runs and RBIs. Tampa is ahead of Boston in every significant offensive category right now, including runs; in a lot of cases the differences aren't huge, but I don't see how we can assume it flips.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 7/2/2009 10:50:00 PM
I hear you Pianow (TB's offense is damn good as well). It's just that right now, Crawford has a pretty sizeable advantage, but with similar skills (OPS), I expect that difference to narrow over a bigger sample size. Also, while still young, I would venture Crawford is what he is (hate that term), whereas Ellsbury should improve. And Fenway typically plays as a much better hitter's park than Tropicana.
 
By: RJK@faketeams
On: 7/2/2009 11:45:00 PM
Whenever you find a stat referencing Rodrigo Lopez you gotta share it. Love it.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 7/3/2009 12:20:00 AM
While I agree, Victor Zambrano and Tanyon Sturtze are jealous.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 7/3/2009 3:31:00 AM
DDD, great blog as usual, but I have to throw in a grammatical pet peeve of my own: dangling modifiers:
After throwing the most pitches (3,914) in all of baseball last year, I avoided Cole Hamels at the draft table in 2009. (I knew you just forced your way out of Denver after McDaniels tried to trade you for Matt Cassel, but did not peg you for a two sport athlete). Also: For someone with an 8.64 ERA over his last three starts, the window to sell Jered Weaver high has probably passed. This is a very narrow point - that if you have an 8.64 ERA over your last three starts, you can't sell Weaver high. One other pet peeve: split infinitives. I like Hamels a bit, but that park is bad for homers, so the high rate might not all be luck. Good point on Jurrjens - Gavin Floyd did something similar from last year to this one, and it's always good to keep in mind that being lucky doesn't mean you won't get better. In fact, all things being equal, I'd bet good luck begets skill growth more than bad luck does.
 
By: nayfel
On: 7/3/2009 4:29:00 AM
Votto over Howard? Come on, Howard hasn't gone below 45-135 in any of the past three seasons and is famous for his second half surges. While I concede Votto has been terrific (when on the field), he can't be considered ahead of Howard yet.
 
By: nayfel
On: 7/3/2009 4:44:00 AM
Howard's Pre and Post all star stats over the last 3 seasons combined:
Pre: .255-77-222 over 934 at bats
Post: .308-76-209 over 776 at bats

There's no question that he is a different player in the second half than in the first half and I would take him over Votto any day of the week.
 
By: Dalton Del Don
On: 7/3/2009 12:57:00 PM
Good point about Howard typically being better after the break. I'll say this, team specific needs have to be considered in Votto v. Howard. If HRs are what you're after, then fine, Howard is the guy. But if its BA (and even a handful of SBs) you're targeting, I'd prefer Votto.
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

NFL Notes
A look around the league regarding Week 10:
Week 10 Observations
  • We've beaten to death Bill Belichick's decision to go for it on 4th and 2 in Sunday night's game (the best take on it I've seen is here), but the real takeaway is how much Cris Collinsworth, Al Michaels, Tony Dungy and Rodney Harrison felt it was their duty to spout the conventional wisdom without even attempting to analyze Belichick's basis for the decision. Throw in Bob Costas, and it's appalling that five guys collectively making more than $10 million a year to interpret the sport for us didn't even consider the issue from a probability standpoint. Sadly, the NBC crew is probably the best one on TV. (Update: Jon Gruden just defended Belichick's call on MNF - good for him).
  • Dominant Offense but Shaky Defense...Barkley and Dirk
    This topic is a spin-off from the Michael Jordan thread of last week.  In the excellent discussion on that thread a mini-debate broke out as to how Charles Barkley compares to Kevin Garnett.  The gist of the brief debate was to question whether Barkley was enough better than Garnett offensively to make them comparable in value as overall players despite Garnett’s huge defensive advantages.  The thing is, though, to me there is a much better comp for Barkley in this generation than Garnett:  Dirk Nowitzki.
    What is Iverson's Legacy?
    What are we talking 'bout? We're talking 'bout *IVERSON*.
    Jennings vs Rose
    Last year Derrick Rose was the NBA Rookie of the Year.  One year later, would you take him over current rookie point guard phenom Brandon Jennings?

    RSS Feeds