ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

Does Not Compute

I'm trying to make sense of some of the big offseason moves in the NBA... and so far, I'm not having much luck. Let's review:

The Pistons reportedly sign Charlie Villanueva and Ben Gordon
The transformation of the Pistons from one of the most physical teams in the league to one of the least is really stunning. I suppose Villanueva will replace some of the "shooting big man" offense Detroit will lose with Rasheed Wallace's inevitable departure... but who's replacing 'Sheed's presence on D? Not Austin Daye... who weighs in at around 190 pounds despite being nearly seven feet tall.

As for Ben Gordon -- didn't we learn last season that adding a scoring two-guard who fancies himself a starter doesn't really work when Rip Hamilton is your incumbent at the two?

The Magic Trade for Vince Carter
If the Magic can retain Hedo Turkoglu, I love this deal. Carter -- who may very well rejuvenate his career returning to his native Central Florida -- steps in as backcourt scorer and end-of-game big shot guy, making Orlando the favorite in the East.

But if Hedo's gone...

Orlando made it to the Finals, in part, because their unconventional "two 6'10" forwards who can shoot the three" lineup created matchup nightmares for the opposition. If Carter simply replaces Turkoglu, the Magic suddenly look a whole lot more conventional.

Is a starting five of Jameer Nelson, Carter, Mickael Pietrus, Rashard Lewis and Dwight Howard significantly better than Nelson, Courtney Lee/Pietrus, Turkoglu, Lewis and Howard?

I don't think so.

Orlando should still coast to a top seed in the East -- I don't see any of the other Southeast teams taking a huge step forward in 2009-10 -- but it's hard to say they're well set-up to repeat as Eastern Conference champions over the Cavs or Celtics, isn't it?

The Grizzlies Trade for Zach Randolph
This one's the biggest head-scratcher of the bunch. Take a young, athletic team with a couple of key players that have less-than-stellar reputations for focus (Rudy Gay) or off-court associations (O.J. Mayo) and add one of the biggest distractions in the NBA... a guy whose reputation for off-court butt-headedness is exceeded only by his reputation for on-court selfishness.

Good plan.

The Randolph acquisition doesn't make much basketball sense -- he's a plodder best-suited to the halfcourt, the rest of the Grizzlies are gazelles -- or financial sense, either. Quentin Richardson's contract expires after this season - Randolph will make over $17 million in 2010-11.

Now, I understand the Memphis roster is short on low-post scoring and rebounding... and those are two things that Randolph does well. And they do have the cap space to absorb Z-Bo without batting an eye. But c'mon -- is this really the best move for the long-term health of the franchise? Wouldn't a offer to, say, David Lee make approximately 100 times more sense?

The Cavaliers Trade for Shaq
I'm inclined to reserve judgment on this one until I see what else the Cavs are up to. There are reports that they're in the mix for Trevor Ariza or Ron Artest -- either of whom would go a long way towards addressing their need for a player who can match up with combo forwards like Rashard Lewis and Hedo Turkoglu.

If this is their only move, I'd be inclined to pan it. But I don't think they're done.

Comments

By: kennruby
On: 7/2/2009 10:00:00 AM
The Pistons will rue the day they went after Ben Gordon. As a Bulls fan, I say good riddance. He may hit a lot of big shots (and I was happy when he did), but he took so many stupid ones and he never passed in the fourth quarter. The team feels better when he's not on the floor, and as long as the Bulls try to find his missing offense somewhere (hey, how about Hamilton?), they'll be better for it.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 7/2/2009 1:37:00 PM
Can't see the point in adding Villanueva and Gordon - those two, Prince, Hamilton, Stuckey - that's not a contender, so why shell out the dough? As for Cleveland - if they get Shaq and say Ariza, but Turkoglu leaves the Magic, then Cleveland is building a team to beat Orlando's team from last year a year too late. Are Shaq and maybe Ariza the best fits against the Celts? And why was Danny Ainge trying to deal Rajon Rondo anyway?
 
By: kevinccp
On: 7/2/2009 6:48:00 PM
You're dead on about Randolph. Four teams in four years, yeah the talent is there, but something's not right (punching Amundson, DUI) when teams are so willing to part with him. I think Memphis felt the need to do something now that the Darko experiment was over. Past Gasol they don't have much inside and were looking for a forward instead of another center to help him.
Artest to the Lakers is brilliant, if you're a Lakers fan. I know it's been discussed about Battier vs. Kobe, but I don't think he looks forward to Artest either. Artest was going to a contender, so why not take him instead? The reoccuring theme here is that the rich seem to get richer; I don't see anyone new making any noise this year (maybe OKC-but that's a real darkhorse).
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

NFL Notes
A look around the league regarding Week 10:
Week 10 Observations
  • We've beaten to death Bill Belichick's decision to go for it on 4th and 2 in Sunday night's game (the best take on it I've seen is here), but the real takeaway is how much Cris Collinsworth, Al Michaels, Tony Dungy and Rodney Harrison felt it was their duty to spout the conventional wisdom without even attempting to analyze Belichick's basis for the decision. Throw in Bob Costas, and it's appalling that five guys collectively making more than $10 million a year to interpret the sport for us didn't even consider the issue from a probability standpoint. Sadly, the NBC crew is probably the best one on TV. (Update: Jon Gruden just defended Belichick's call on MNF - good for him).
  • Dominant Offense but Shaky Defense...Barkley and Dirk
    This topic is a spin-off from the Michael Jordan thread of last week.  In the excellent discussion on that thread a mini-debate broke out as to how Charles Barkley compares to Kevin Garnett.  The gist of the brief debate was to question whether Barkley was enough better than Garnett offensively to make them comparable in value as overall players despite Garnett’s huge defensive advantages.  The thing is, though, to me there is a much better comp for Barkley in this generation than Garnett:  Dirk Nowitzki.
    What is Iverson's Legacy?
    What are we talking 'bout? We're talking 'bout *IVERSON*.
    Jennings vs Rose
    Last year Derrick Rose was the NBA Rookie of the Year.  One year later, would you take him over current rookie point guard phenom Brandon Jennings?

    RSS Feeds