ROTOWIRE.COM NFL MLB / Minors NBA NHL GOLF RACING    COMMUNITY FORUMS PODCASTS MYROTOWIRE ASK AN EXPERT GAMES

Buy Lowest

The "buy-low" sell high mantra is so overused, it's almost meaningless. Try to get B.J. Upton before his average goes up - never mind he's stealing bases in droves and leading off every day for a potent Rays lineup. Try to get Jon Lester before his ERA comes down - never mind he struck out 12 in his last outing. In fact, the typical way the term is used is after a struggling player shows signs, then the "expert" feels safe enough to advise his readers to buy low before everyone else catches on. Well, maybe that works if your league-mates are novices, but in most leagues the buy-low windows on Lester and Upton are closed. To that end, I figured I'd offer some buy-low candidates - for whom the discount price tag still applies.

The caveat here is I have no idea whether these guys will bounce back. Only that they'll be cheap, and IF they bounce back, they could be monsters. Therefore it's a good time to roll the dice.

Geovany Soto - he's being benched temporarily for Koyie Hill. He had a sore shoulder last month. His numbers are abysmal. Still, he was one of the best hitting backstops in the game last season, and the Cubs need him to hit, especially with Aramis Ramirez on the shelf for another six weeks or so. Soto will get his chances.

Carlos Quentin - he got off to a fast start, then fell apart and was eventually DL'd due to plantar fasciaitis. He could return in a week or so, and when healthy is a legitimate 35-40 homer guy.

David Ortiz - he's still in the lineup almost every day, so the Red Sox haven't given up on him yet. If there was something irreparably wrong with him that wouldn't be the case. I don't pretend to know why he's had such a terrible start, but he had the best year of his career in 2007 and is still just 33 years old.

Chris Young (AZ) - he's lost some at-bats to Gerardo Parra/Eric Byrnes, but with Conor Jackson out indefinitely, he's still playing more often than not. Young strikes out far too much, but he has 25-30 HR power, steals bases (on the rare occasion that he reaches) and plays in a good hitter's park.

Stephen Drew - he's gotten a few hits this week, and that might actually be enough to close the true buy-low window, but with just two homers and a terrible batting average, it's possible you could still get him at a steep discount.

Scott Kazmir - he's been a disaster this year, and he's on the DL, but his quad is feeling better, and remember this is a pitcher who struck out 166 batters in 152.1 IP last year.

Ricky Nolasco - he's in the minors trying to straighten things out after a terrible start, and his peripherals really weren't that terrible even in the majors (.400 BABIP!). Based on what he did last season and his home park, he's worth a look now before he does anything positive that jacks up his price.

Scott Baker - he's been victimized by a ton of home runs and a terrible strand rate, but his K:BB numbers are still good, and I expect the long balls and the bullpen implosions to normalize.

Ervin Santana - he's been awful his last couple starts, and it's possible his elbow is still a problem. But it's also possible that he's just struggling with his "feel" due to the prolonged absence, and once he gets it back, you're talking about a pitcher who struck out 214 batters in 219 IP last year.

This isn't rocket science, obviously, but if you want to have the chance for a big profit, you have to take on big risk. As soon as a player shows signs of being his old self, and you feel safe about making the offer - well, guess what, the other owner feels the same way, and his price just went way up, usually unreasonably so as his owner treats him as if he were completely certain to rebound. The time to act on these players is now when you're still unsure if they'll come around. The discomfort you feel about acquiring these players is precisely why they are good values. You can have comfort and certainty, or value, but not both.

<p>

I am certain of one thing though - that *some* of these players will pan out. And also that some will not. And that I don't know which ones are which. I do know that if you had a stock portfolio of these guys collectively, based on what they cost now, it would almost certainly outperform a similar portfolio of the hottest guys in the league based on their current cost. That's because the market usually exaggerates its response to short-term data. You can take advantage of that exaggeration by buying lowest.

Comments

By: Mark Stopa
On: 6/4/2009 6:33:00 AM
To paraphrase Bill Simmons, are you sure Ortiz is only 33?
 
By: Skinsnutt
On: 6/4/2009 6:56:00 AM
There is no way Ortiz is 33. He is probably closer to 37 which would explain the decline. He is probably just done.
 
By: Charlie Zegers
On: 6/4/2009 10:21:00 AM
What about Howie Kendrick? Would seem to fit your profile of a "Buy Lowest" candidate.
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 6/4/2009 10:27:00 AM
Yes, perfect example. The criteria is someone who was once good, hasn't yet lost all paths to playing time and whom no one (yourself included) has any confidence about.
 
By: kevinccp
On: 6/4/2009 12:58:00 PM
This reminds me of the discussion about players going higher/lower than they should in the draft *without* using ADP. I think you need to cite which guys/type of players you would offer for the "buy-low" players.

Cross Baker off after today's performance, a perfect example though.
 
By: Dave Regan
On: 6/4/2009 1:04:00 PM
I had no idea Papi was listed at 33. Is he also said to check in at 220 lbs.? The next thing you know, Albert Pujols will be walking around claiming to have been born in 1980.
 
By: Scott Pianowski
On: 6/4/2009 2:19:00 PM
"In fact, the typical way the term is used is after a struggling player shows signs, then the "expert" feels safe enough to advise his readers to buy low before everyone else catches on." . . . I totally agree, that angle drives me nuts. It's not helpful to anyone in a competitive league.
 
By: iceguy
On: 6/4/2009 2:58:00 PM
Papi can't be 37. That would mean he didn't crack .900 OPS until after he turned 31. And then he went on a tear from 31 to 36? I doubt it. He might be off by a year, but not 3 or 4 like Simmons claims. I'm with Bill James - Papi is who he says he is.

How about Rafael Furcal for a buy-lowest?
 
By: Chris Liss
On: 6/4/2009 3:35:00 PM
Yeah, Scott - you've definitely made that point before many times as well.
 
By: ephinz
On: 6/5/2009 5:20:00 AM
The question in fantasy sports isn't buy low/sell high. It is really whether to sell low (Big Papi) or buy high (Joe Mauer). OR sell at a loss and buy at a premium.
 

Leave a comment

Commenting is restricted to registered users only. Please register or login now to submit a comment.

Tell Someone

  • Digg it
  • submit to reddit reddit
  • Add to Mixx!

Recent Favorites

Week 8 Observations
  • The Giants are broken right now, and it's unclear how long they will take to fix. Eli Manning insists his foot isn't bothering him, but the entire team on both sides of the ball is out of sync. The home game against the Chargers next week might be just what the doctor ordered for the offense, but unless the Giants generate a bigger pass rush, find a solution at free safety and get linebacker Michael Boley back to help out in coverage, Philip Rivers will light them up. No one on the team except Corey Webster (and occasionally Terrell Thomas) can cover anyone right now.
  • Pay Attention to Opposing Defenses? Or just the Celtics
    In my last Hoops Lab I suggested paying attention to the opposing defenses when setting your starting line-ups.  Specifically, I suggested keeping an eye on the Celtics, Cavs and Spurs.  Five days into the season, how is that philosophy panning out?
    Ranting
    The following is nothing more than me getting random thoughts off my chest, some about sports, some not:
    Why Fantasy Basketball is Better Than Fantasy Football
    It's just more fun.
    The year with no Heisman favorite
    This was supposed to be the year of the "Big 3" in regards to the Heisman Trophy. Tim Tebow, Colt McCoy, and reigning Heisman winner Sam Bradford. They were considered by most far and away the favorites. Now, Bradford is done, and Tebow and McCoy are struggling mightily. Additionally, nobody has really stepped into the void. This year, we're over half of the way through the season and nobody has stepped up as a solid, definitive Heisman favorite.

    RSS Feeds